13 thoughts on “Boeing 787 Dreamliner – Orders and Deliveries”

1. 

   Mike

   09/10/2018 at 00:16

   Easy access table to engine type fitted to each 787/9 aircraft

   Reply
2. 

   John Wills

   28/02/2019 at 13:40

   Boeing spent millions and billions of dollars producing the 787. This airliner is not much different compared to their 777. Did Boeing make a mistake introducing a design which is very similar to their 777?

   Reply
   1. 

      Pisquali

      28/02/2019 at 14:13

      Hi John,
      thank you for stopping by.

      At first glance it seems that there could be a some cross over between the Boeing 787 and the Boeing 777. They are, however, quite a different class of airliner. Where the 787 can be seen as a replacement of the once popular Boeing 767 in the lower end of the twin aisle market, the Boeing 777 is now the replacement for the Boeing 747. As we enter the age of the giant twins, the 777 is at the upper end of that class. To confuse the matter further, Boeing is investigating a 797 which would sit between the 737 and the 787.

      Different tools for different jobs.

      Cheers Peter

      Reply
   2. 

      jdghj

      26/03/2022 at 12:22

      John, The 787 is massively different to the 777.
      The 787 uses a wing made mostly of composite.. The fuselage is also made mostly of composite. The fuselage is also molded together using single piece barrel sections (as opposed to making a skeleton frame and then riveting a skin to it). Numerous systems that are typically operated by hydraulics are instead electrically operated in the 787. The engines are bleedless.
      Those features have never been seen before on a jet airliner. Doing just one of features those would be big step forward in what is an extremely conservative industry, yet the 787 made several steps forward in one go.
      It may seem like those changes were small but you need to understand engineering and the industry to realise how big a deal the 787 is. There has been no leap forward like this in jet airliner technology for the last 50 years. There will probably not be another jet that makes a this much of a step forward for another 30 or maybe even 50 years.

      Reply
3. 

   John Wills

   28/02/2019 at 14:50

   Pisquali-

   Thanks for the information. Now I am waiting to see the final design of the MOM airliner. I believe that it will be somewhat similar to the 767 with twin aisle and 2-3-2 seating. It will be a winner.

   Reply
   1. 

      Pisquali

      28/02/2019 at 14:55

      I think you’re right John. It is always exciting to have a new airliner on the drawing board.

      Reply
4. 

   Michael

   24/04/2019 at 16:21

   Is there a table or chart showing which airframes were assembled in NC and WA?

   Reply
   1. 

      Pisquali

      25/04/2019 at 15:03

      Hi Michael,
      we have looked and are unable to locate such a table. The South Carolina factory is responsible for the aft fuselage sections 47 and 48 of the 787-8, 787-9 and 787-10. Those of the 787-8 and 787-9 are flown by cargo plane to the Everett factory for assembly there, whilst those of the 787-10 are assembled in the South Carolina factory. They are simply too big to be transported. There has been some media coverage about possible sub-standard production at South Carolina and Qatar Airways has refused to take any products originating in that facility. We wait with interest to see what the truth is. Boeing needs to get this right as they are having enough headaches already.
      Cheers Peter

      Reply
5. 

   Mikael

   02/05/2019 at 22:29

   Hey there, is there anything really interesting about controlling the complex systems on the Boeing 747?

   Reply
   1. 

      Pisquali

      04/05/2019 at 07:07

      Hi Mikael,
      You could say it is all interesting, but that depends on your area of interest I guess.
      Cheers Peter

      Reply
      1. 

         Mikael

         05/05/2019 at 16:54

         Could you give some examples please? Thanks

         Reply
6. 

   Jack

   09/05/2019 at 03:19

   Can you name any 3 environmental impacts that the Boeing 747 may cause?

   Reply
   1. 

      Pisquali

      11/05/2019 at 01:08

      Hi Jack,
      maybe we won’t say that out loud next time we fly, right?

      Three environmental impacts?
      1. The early 747 engines weren’t as efficient as today, so certainly pollution was a factor.
      2. Staying with the above engines, noise was certainly a factor that affected those living near airports.
      3. A positive was that by carrying more passengers fewer aircraft were needed to complete that same task. So in effect, there were fewer flights creating noise and pollution.

      Does that help?
      Cheers Peter

      Reply